George Galloway made me realise that Arabs should rethink their neediness

21e7e-ku-xlargeIf Jean-Paul Sartre wanted evidence that his concept of “being-for-others” existed, then he would have found it by observing the way that Arabs assign value to themselves through white people.

Yes, I said it. Arabs need white people to approve of them being Arab in order to feel good about their identity.

I understand that this a big claim to make. Sartre may very well be turning in his grave. However, this dependence on external validation is perhaps one reason Arabs are so mad that white racists still exist.

The first time I truly understood this White-Approval-Addiction was when I, along with hundreds of other Arabs, attended the No Justice, No Peace talk in Hurstville on July 2, 2013. George Galloway, a British Member of Parliament, was flown out to Sydney to “discuss the history of Palestine, and tie that history to the historic developments unfolding in the Middle East today”.

Hosting a British politician to discuss Palestinian history and Arab politics as opposed to inviting Palestinians, such as Ali Abunimah or Saree Makdisi, who specialise in Palestinian history and Arab politics, struck me as rather peculiar. Do white people draw larger crowds? Are Arab academics not seen as objective authority figures in the field of Arab politics? Or do we just want to hear a white person come out in support of Arabs, and, more specifically, Palestinians? Whatever the reason may be, the focus on offering white people the exclusive opportunity to discuss Arab history increases the likelihood of Arabs viewing themselves through others.

Events like No Justice, No Peace are, however, commonly marketed as places where Arabs can meet to gain control over how they are determined. And, although the event was intended to be a discussion on the history of Palestine it was, for the greater part of the evening, a lesson on the history of the Arab world (in case us Arabs were not clear on the reasons that caused the dispossession of our land and displacement of our people).

Indeed, the magical moment of this lesson was when Galloway claimed that the golden age of Arabs would have persisted if it were not for the 20th Century British and French occupation of the Middle East. The purpose of that claim was to highlight that Arabs – sans imperialism and colonialism – have the ‘capacity’ to be a great people. Galloway’s words of affirmation were followed by cheers and applause from the audience. The audience was clearly pleased that a white man, of all people, saw them as humans also capable of civility, humanity and brilliance. This reaction puzzled me. Why, after all this time, do we need white approval?

One possible answer is that we, as Arabs, need white approval because we do not know who we are as a collective group. All we hear from our parents is how Arabs are the people of Ibn Rushd, Ibn Sina, Rufaidah bint Sa’ad and the other greats who came prior to European enlightenment. All we hear from the media or read in books is that Arabs are a people that could not pioneer great things in the modern world because they were far too engrossed in their own civil, racial, religious and sectarian wars. These blanket statements that surround us leave us thinking that there must be something strange about Arabs. Consequently, we divorce ourselves from anything associated with being Arab.

This point is perhaps most evident in Arab parents, particularly those living in the Middle East, whom raise children who can barely speak Arabic, but whose command of English is as good as any Oxford graduate. We must recognise that there is nothing progressive about an Arab child who is detached from the very thing that defines the essence of their identity. In fact, in order to prevent instances of Arabs needing to seek affirmation and approval from an external group of people, we must socialise Arab children (and adults) into understanding what it is to be Arab. We must teach them that our modern narrative is not one of complete hopelessness and defeat.

I do believe that, in some instances, White-Approval-Addiction is a fact of life. But, I am not talking about those instances where, in order to survive, we have to win the approval of the racially dominant group. I am talking about the instances whereby we seek white approval in order to feel good about ourselves. I am talking about an obsession that comes about because we have not taken the time to learn about ourselves and recognise who we are, and our achievements (both recent and historic), as a people.

Instead of looking for white people’s approval and seeking their affirmation and validation, why do we not spend time nurturing our own identities?

Categories: Politics

5 replies»

  1. George Galloway was representing Palestine before you were even born. Since when does the truth get filtered by skin colour? Are you more concerned with his skin colour or the message? Didn't the Prophet abolish racism 1400 years ago?George Galloway has done more for the Palestinian and Arab cause than most of the impotent Arab leaders out there. For as long as our attitudes drive us to divide along the lines of race, colour and religion, Palestine will never be liberated.


  2. It is rather disheartening that this is the ONLY message you took home from an hour or so of a great talk; words that most of our Arab leaders are too scared to articulate for the fear of destroying their beloved relationship with the WHITE that they worship so much- with the exception of very few ofcourse. Has it ever occured to you that with the vast majority of our speakers being Arab that it would be worthwhile to display a different point of view from the other side?Is it your arrogance or is it your pride that makes you reject words spoken by a white man?? Did it really bother you so much that a white man is telling you you can be great? For whatever your reason is, it is obvious that it has completely blinded you, or perhaps driven you insane that you felt the need to drown the voice of a man, just because he's white. and no other reason. It is clear that you have been misinformed my dear, for it seems you have blocked your ears and had no intention of taking a message home from that lecture in the first place.Because among other facts and points raised, it was alerted that another Sykes-Picot is on the way, that when Mark Sykes and Francois Picot sat down and separated the Arab world into tiny segregated pieces, divided it among themselves, and drew lines on a map that it soon decided the Palestenian fate, and implanted hatred among all of us Arabs, and that made us weak. That if we, instead united, we would be strong. And this is about to happen all over again. Or is this not really important to you? ofcourse not, he is a white man, obviously THAT is more important. On a side note, get your facts right- George Galloway flew to Sydney to fight for the Julian Assange case and not to give a history talk about Palestine.


  3. I don't think this piece shows "arrogance" or "pride". I found it a thought-provoking inquiry into the idea of white approval. The author seemed to feel patronised by aspects of the Galloway speech, which is perfectly valid. The fact that it was met with such vitriol suggests it might have touched a nerve or two.


  4. Why is it so when Arab leaders bow down to the "White power" signing away agreements that allow the exploitation and control of palestine a topic of less importance than a white MUSLIM Man standing for our rights?? This article is an obvious act of denial for many reasons, but mainly the following 2:1- Do Arabs even have a strong leader worthy to run an evolution against the zionist tirany (instead of being busy killing each other)??2- Why are you judging a person/ or an audience's reaction based on race? Please refer to the quote by prophet Mohammed "All mankind is from Adam and Eve, an Arab has no superiority over a non-Arab nor a non-Arab has any superiority over an Arab; also a white has no superiority over a black nor a black has any superiority over a white – except by piety and good action. Learn that every Muslim is a brother to every Muslim and that the Muslims constitute one brotherhood"


  5. Please outline the patronising aspects of the Galloway speech. From what was outlined in the 2nd comment it sounds like a great talk or a wake up call- until proven otherwise. Facts please not just mere talk.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account.Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account.Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account.Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s