Politics

Brexit demonstrates the Left’s failure on Race issues

Brexit Tomek Nacho

What really lies at the heart of the “Leave” campaign’s Brexit win? Image: Tomek Nacho

In an article on race and British cultural studies, Roxy Harris noted that the field’s founders – E.P. Thompson and Raymond Williams – ignored “the place of black and brown British subjects in the national polity”. Thompson’s classic 1968 study, The Making of the English Working Class, for example, while covering “topics such as the liberty of ‘the free-born Englishman’” was silent about “the part played by the Empire, the slaves, plantations, the East India Company and so on”.

These great theorists of British society were race-blind.

But it seems that little has been learned from this partial and parochial view of British social and economic history, especially in the writings of a small but vocal group from what we will refer to as “the white Left”.

Since last Friday’s #Brexit vote, where a referendum was held in the UK to determine whether Britain would exit the European Union (EU), Australian writers John Pilger and Jeff Sparrow wrote in New Matilda and Overland respectively that the vote to leave the EU was a knife in the back of neoliberalism (Pilger) and testimony to the success of participatory democracy (Sparrow).

These sentiments are in line with the crowing to be heard from the Left Exit (#Lexit) camp that #Brexit is a nail in the coffin of austerity-Europe. Admonishing those on the Left who voted to remain in the EU as out-of-touch, metropolitan, middle class elite who are comfortable with anti-working class government policy, this brave vanguard presented an analysis that was blind to the fact that Brexit was fought and won on a campaign of racism and xenophobia that played divide and rule with the actual black, brown and white working class.

Tacitly accepting this line, many voices from the white Left, such as that of sociologist and anti-austerity campaigner Lisa McKenzie, repeatedly claimed that to speak of racism was to deride the “real” concerns of ordinary British people. There is no remorse, despite the rapidly unfolding reports of post-Brexit attacks on Eastern Europeans and racialised minorities on the streets of the (dis)United Kingdom.

australia brexit example

Brexit campaigners look to Australia’s immigration system. Source: eobserver.co.uk

‘Whenever working-class people have tried to talk about the effects of immigration on their lives, shouting “backward” and “racist” has become a middle-class pastime,’ McKenzie writes in her Guardian opinion piece.

But we do not need to lay the blame for racism at the door of the white working class to nonetheless accept the fact that the cornerstone of Brexit was a fear of immigrants “taking our jobs”, and that “taking our country back” is a vision that never included those already excluded from the national story – that is, the descendants of Britain’s postcolonial immigrants and the more recent arrivals from eastern Europe.

The fact that immigration and multiculturalism were at the heart of a large majority of Leave voters’ concerns – as opposed to capitalist exploitation and democratic deficit – has been borne out. UK Independence Party (UKIP) leader Nigel Farage, whose supporters David Cameron had been appeasing by calling the Referendum, quite clearly fought on these lines. In fact, it was Farage who, brazenly ignoring the assassination of Labour MP Jo Cox by a far right-wing activist, claimed victory “without a single bullet being fired“.

But on the Left too, the dog whistle of anti-immigration sentiment can be heard in the desperate attempt to turn the Brexit campaign to socialist advantage. John Pilger, for example, while admitting in his New Matilda article that today’s refugees were created by “invasions and imperial mayhem”, claims that “all this has now come home to Europe, enriching the likes of Tony Blair and impoverishing and disempowering millions”. While refugees might not be responsible for their own plight, according to Pilger, they nonetheless impoverish and disempower Britons.

We share the sentiments behind the call to heed the utter desolation of the British working class, betrayed over and over by an elite in thrall to its own power and enrichment. But it must be noted that it is black and other racialised people who have lost out most as a result of the UK government’s cuts, and it was middle class voters in the least culturally diverse regions, with no interest in the fortunes of any part of the working class, who mainly voted to leave.

migrants milking our benefits

The narratives peddled blatantly ignore political and historical reality. Source: euobserver.co.uk

A failure to employ an intersectional analysis linking class and race in a reading of the referendum results is to fall into a racist trap: one that equates the working class with whiteness and conflates a pro-immigration stance with the support of big business interests over the interests of the “everyman”.

Despite years of anti-racist activism, to which they perversely lay claim, today’s white Left pundits are as race blind as Thompson and Williams were fifty years before them.

The reduction of racism to a distraction, or what Sparrow referred to as “identity politics”, is also a failure to take seriously the material capacity of racism, as though the processes of racism were but an abstraction from class politics rather than being productive and destructive in their own right. It is a reduction that implies the battle against racism is about winning back an injured image rather than a stolen country – as if anti-racism politics is about fending off an insult rather than an occupier.

Further, a reading of the Brexit results that explains away the racism of many Leave voters as an understandable reflex in the face of cuts and joblessness is one that is ignorant of the actual history of race. This is particularly galling from an Australian perspective, where it cannot be argued that anything like the European levels of post-2008 impoverishment exists. Nonetheless, deeply embedded systemic racism and visceral everyday racism are a durable feature of Australian public culture.

Race developed in tandem with the expropriation of the majority of the world by Europeans, and is inextricable from the project of dividing the deserving from the undeserving, the desirable from the undesirable. It was a pseudo-scientific taxonomy invented to justify European wealth and domination over the globe. It may play out through situations of deprivation and exploitation in the postcolonial world, but it is not reducible to ‘understandable reactions’ of the have-nots, constantly undercut by Schrodinger’s immigrant. Against the backdrop of such a history, the leftist dismissal of racism as a distraction is a post-racial continuation of that same taxonomy; again justifying European decisions that overwhelmingly impact – and kill – today’s undesirables.

It is here that the abject failure of the white Left discloses itself: in failing to address racism, or reducing it to a diversion from the ‘real’ (and ‘separate’) issue of class exploitation, they once again ignore ‘the place of black and brown British subjects in the national polity’. They might justify it as a necessary cost of some lofty, deferred ideal – The Movement, The Impending Revolution, The People – but outside and against the buy-in of those most affected by the decision, such a gesture is little more than a sacrifice of (predominately) brown bodies for white ideals.

Hardly the materialist politics such groups applaud themselves for.

_________________

By Alana Lentin and Mohamad Tabbaa

Alana is Associate Professor of Cultural and Social Analysis at Western Sydney University. Her website is www.alanalentin.net

Mohamad Tabbaa is a PhD Candidate in Criminology & Law at The University of Melbourne, and formerly Executive Director at The Islamic Council of Victoria. 
Advertisements

4 replies »

  1. This article constructs ‘a straw man’ “white left” blind to issues of race despite the fact that BAME writers / organisations with a long history of fighting racism, including Indian Workers Association; Bangladeshi Workers Council of Britain, Dreda Say Mitchell, Tariq Ali, supported the Lexit campaign. None are of these organisations or individuals are ignorant to the dangers of racial hostility encouraged by UKIP propaganda, and neither were the vast majority of left wing activists who campaigned to leave the EU on the basis that the EU’s neoliberal agenda is inimical to the interests of immigrants and workers . The Lexit campaign sought to challenge and counter UKIP lies, for example by campaigning for free movement of peoples not just within the EU but from without and against the EU’s “Fortress Europe” policy, which according to Amnesty has seen more than 20,000 immigrants, mostly from Africa and Middle East, drown off the coast of Europe since 2000. It’s a pity this article did not engage with the real arguments in the debate.

    Like

  2. An absurd article. No one on the ‘white’ left ignores the role racism played on the part of the Brexit campaign. Yet, surprisingly it is possible to hold two, or more, conflicting ideas in their heads. The EU exists for the free movement of capital and labour. Both of these exist to facilitate the domination of Europe by Germany, and to a slightly lesser extent France and Britain. Immigrant labour has been the hammer to Thatcherism’s anvil. It has been a failure of the left, the unions and the Labour Party, that they have been unable or unwilling to actually try and defend the rights of all workers, ‘native’ or otherwise.
    If Corbyn had backed the Leave campaign, which he historically done as a Bennite, then the terrain would have shifted.

    But it’s not as if the Remain campaign was built out of sunshine and roses? Their argument was just as racist: borders can be maintained better by being in the EU. We can use Turkey as a bulwark.
    Hardly a progressive sentiment.

    “and it was middle class voters in the least culturally diverse regions, with no interest in the fortunes of any part of the working class, who mainly voted to leave.”
    This is absurdly wrong. Leaving aside that the working class is the most racially diverse class, it was overwhelmingly middle class people in London, the south, and some inner city areas in the North that voted for Remain. Think of all the rhetoric about economic Armageddon. And now the rage, how dare these dumb, prole chavs ruin the economic stability of the UK, nay the world?

    I’ll finish with one last thing: despite the words ‘white supremacy’ not being used, its ideas are heavy in the article. “We live in a white supremacist society, why didn’t EP Thomson talk about the oppression of Lakshmi Mittal and it’s effect on the UK steel industry?”
    Yet, Eastern Europeans, who many would consider ‘white’ have suffered in recent years just as heavily. For every Farage rant against Muslims, there’s another against Poles, Romanians and Roma. When Cameron deigned to take in 12,000 Syrian refugees (what a hero!), he used it as an excuse to kick out thousands of Eastern Europeans.

    Like

  3. This is all rather bizarre. What will be the actual result of Brexit with respect to immigration? It means that England is no longer part of the EU iron curtain descending on southern Europe to keep nonwhite immigrants out, and that white Poles and other Eastern Europeans no longer have automatic access to England, unlike nonwhite refugees. This does not in any way detract from the ugly fact that the Brexit campaign was a racist and anti-immigrant campaign, and that its success has emboldened the racists and been accompanied by racist and anti-immigrant violence. But that is because the campaign was presented on a silver platter to the racists and fascists. Indeed even the Lexit campaign served in this direction, being that the CPB and SPEW, two of its main components, are known for their “British jobs for British workers” stance, and the third component, the SWP, is rather discredited lately.
    Whose fault is this? Corbyn. Not because he didn’t campaign hard enough for Remain, but for the opposite reason. He spent his entire political career before his ascension to leadership of the Labour Party as an opponent of the EU. And unlike the CPB or SPEW, his political record is unstained by anti-immigrant chauvinism. By capitulating to the Blairites and the rest of the right wing of the Labour Party and coming out for Remain, he handed working class opposition to the EU over to the racists and fascists. And now he is taking the consequences. As the British Spartacists put it, “crime does not pay.”

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s